We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or even the information linked to over the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have read the acquired counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues of your matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard towards the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession with the subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided via the competent court after hearing the parties if pending because the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this part for interim custody of the subject premises In case the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
Sign up for E-mail Notification of latest opinions The cases listed under have experienced opinions filed for them within the last fourteen days. The following information is obtainable for each case: Information Sheet - Click a case number to view case details, such as signing JusticesJudges and participating attorneys.
13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some length, both parties have agreed to your disposal of the moment petition over the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner and also private respondents and will just take care of each of the aspects of the case and be certain that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
However it's made crystal clear that police is free to acquire action against any person that is indulged in criminal activities matter to law. However no harassment shall be caused on the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of legislation. Police shall also ensure respect of your family drop in accordance with legislation and whenever they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they could act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall protected concrete evidence and acquire necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate being a issue of security of your house is concerned, which just isn't public place under the Act 1977. nine. Thinking of the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition continues to be reached. Consequently, this petition is hereby disposed of from the terms stated above. Read more
Summaries offer a concise insight into the realm of dispute resolution exterior traditional court proceedings. In Pakistan, arbitration serves as a vital alternative for resolving commercial conflicts here quickly and successfully.
11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is really a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; When the parents with the boy or Woman usually do not approve of these types of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they're able to do if they could Slice off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this sort of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or male that is a major, the pair is neither harassed by any one nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to endeavor by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against these kinds of person(s) as provided by legislation.
Some bodies are supplied statutory powers to issue steerage with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, such as the Highway Code.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives from the police should be to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and previously mentioned all, make certain law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The law enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair for the offender as well as the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other Courts, However they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.
Under Article 199, the court possesses the authority to review government guidelines for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university and to safeguard aggrieved parties' rights. For that reason, this petition is admissible based on established court precedents, along with the respondents' objections are overruled. Read more
ten. Based about the findings on the inquiry committee, this petition is just not thought of maintainable and it is therefore liable to become dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or the information linked to to the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
Criminal cases Within the common regulation tradition, courts decide the legislation applicable to some case by interpreting statutes and applying precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Not like most civil regulation systems, common legislation systems follow the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their have previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all decreased courts should make decisions consistent with the previous decisions of higher courts.